Give Tutor a try

@thibault For some reason, it only analyzed my blitz games. I wish it would analyze my Rapid or Classical games. Those are serious controls.

@thibault how many rated games do i need to have for it to analyze? right now it says not enough

0. I really love this tool both practically and aesthetically, really epic!

1. Tutor may already control for this, but in bullet/blitz accuracy comparisons time control is important. Like 5-minute games instead of 3-minute games may increase their relative accuracy, tactical awareness, and flagging relative to others unconnected to real progress.

2. I think tutor differs from insights in that a tutor would want to look at what's most relevant for improvement i.e. only games in the past 3 months rather than everything. Allow users to opt out of which time controls they want scanned to speed up queue.

3. Besides comparing players to others their same rating, add a reference point to players rated 200 higher so people know just how much they need to improve in that category to get to the next level.

4. Definitions of terms like "resourcefulness" is a little "far" from the main tutor page, like needing to click on time control category first then on the specific sub-category with the term to see the definition may hinder those who aren't good at navigating user interfaces.

This is a really good tool for people who want to know where their weaknesses are!

But:
-If you play more games after you used the tutor, those games don't contribute to the sum. I wonder if every time you play a new game, that new game would be added with all of the other games to be analyzed in the tutor.

-Instead of saying "Much worse than your peers" maybe you could say something that doesn't affect someone negatively because of thoughts like "Oh no! I am terrible!" (Nobody wants to be much worse than someone)

Other than that, the tool is pretty useful for many competitive and developing players.

@Smartmangopie said in #54:

-Instead of saying "Much worse than your peers" maybe you could say something that doesn't affect someone negatively because of thoughts like "Oh no! I am terrible!" (Nobody wants to be much worse than someone)

To add on to this, it can say, you are better than 10% of people or 50% of people, etc.

-Instead of saying "Much worse than your peers" maybe you could say something that doesn't affect someone negatively because of thoughts like "Oh no! I am terrible!" (Nobody wants to be much worse than someone)

this is silly

edit: I like the tool specifically because it is pointing out my weaknesses which is the part I should focus on to get better. If I wanted an electronic tool to validate me I would open a chatgpt session.

To add on to this, it can say, you are better than 10% of people or 50% of people, etc.

That already exists: https://adjva4.dpdns.org/stat/rating/distribution/blitz

@me_unsolicited said in #56:

-Instead of saying "Much worse than your peers" maybe you could say something that doesn't affect someone negatively because of thoughts like "Oh no! I am terrible!" (Nobody wants to be much worse than someone)

this is silly

edit: I like the tool specifically because it is pointing out my weaknesses which is the part I should focus on to get better. If I wanted an electronic tool to validate me I would open a chatgpt session.

Maybe and I get that, too. I'm just saying what I'd think would be an improvement, not like it's the best but I do partly agree with you now, actually. A.I. is very good at being nice.

I could have been less bitchy in my response. sorry for the aggro

@me_unsolicited said in #56:

To add on to this, it can say, you are better than 10% of people or 50% of people, etc.

That already exists: https://adjva4.dpdns.org/stat/rating/distribution/blitz

No but your flagging skills, speed, accuracy, etc. should have rankings as well in the tutor place.

@thibault I tried to load my games, initially it started (at least the game animations started), then i got this "error" after a minute or so: