Currently there exists some commentary about early mainline moves but my suggestion to increase the opening theory available on lichess would be to allow people to submit their own commentary about positions and then have an upvote/downvote system to ensure the best analysis comes first. This could turn lichess into a great source of in depth opening theory.
If Players are allowed to make their own commentary on an Opening's in study and stuff. this will go south quicker than covid spread.
The edit's and stuff would need to be approved by Mods
They could have a system like Wikipedia.
https://adjva4.dpdns.org/page/opening-content
Feel free to message me if you are intrested.
@WillBo77 you can start by contributing to the Wikibooks Chess Opening Theory pages, which are used inside Lichess in Analysis Board (and, with LiChess Tools, also in Openings and on hover on the opening link in various other pages.)
see https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Chess_Opening_Theory
#1
"upvote/downvote"
* Guess Englund Gambit upvoted and Berlin Defense downvoted...
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.