Thanks for a great post. I wanted to answer immediately but wanted a good example:
I am at a measly 1600 ELO, with a decent 2200 puzzle rating here. For me it is [perhaps] not a question of V vs M of unseen positions. It is about analysing what I actually see. Take a puzzle from this morning. Took me a long time.
https://adjva4.dpdns.org/training/k6YCL
SPOILER BELOW, I SUGGEST YOU STOP READING HERE IF YOU WANT TO SOLVE IT FIRST.
My thinking goes: "1: OK Nc3 is attacked thrice and defended twice. If I do nothing I lose the N. If I take d4 Nc3 still falls. Even if magically save my N, I am still three p down. 2: attacks & crazy sacs around his K? QxR ? achieves nothing. Rg8 ? to attack/deflect his R. Han even ignore that and just take my N. 3: Rxf7? Rf8? Nothing, and I a have no sense how close I am to the answer! 4: what about stepping away with Na4? I might save the N but have no threat.5: instead my mind wanders into high orbit. At this point in puzzle solving my mind goes into "magical mode". I look at illegal moves, in order to unearth patterns I have missed. I try teleporting Qa8+ Kc7 Nd5+ ??? Still nothing or Qf4 or even Qxf3? Threatens nothing and fails to defend around my K. 6: ONLY NOW do I see that Q (not R) xf7 threatens #1! Qb6 fails to Nh4 And I say to myself 'I have solved it' and make the first move. Green!"
But black comes up with the fiendish defence of Nd2+ Kc1 Ba3+!!. I had truly missed this. I see now that I must be carful to respond correctly. And here is the interesting bit: If I had seen this line before making the first move, I had been stuck for yet a while. I am guessing that if I had seen this line beforehand, I would have played KxN in my mind. But now that I had it in front of me, after a minute in dawned on me that I must not capture since that 1: allows spit checks 2: self pins my Nc3, which was instrumental in the line above! So in the end only Kc1 remains.
So, I do not have a clear full-board "V". So I must resort to analytical thinking "A" blended with "M" . In conclusion I guess my model is best described as: "A" * "M" * "V" with many flaws!
Thanks for a great post. I wanted to answer immediately but wanted a good example:
I am at a measly 1600 ELO, with a decent 2200 puzzle rating here. For me it is [perhaps] not a question of V vs M of unseen positions. It is about analysing what I actually see. Take a puzzle from this morning. Took me a long time.
https://adjva4.dpdns.org/training/k6YCL
SPOILER BELOW, I SUGGEST YOU STOP READING HERE IF YOU WANT TO SOLVE IT FIRST.
My thinking goes: "1: OK Nc3 is attacked thrice and defended twice. If I do nothing I lose the N. If I take d4 Nc3 still falls. Even if magically save my N, I am still three p down. 2: attacks & crazy sacs around his K? QxR ? achieves nothing. Rg8 ? to attack/deflect his R. Han even ignore that and just take my N. 3: Rxf7? Rf8? Nothing, and I a have no sense how close I am to the answer! 4: what about stepping away with Na4? I might save the N but have no threat.5: instead my mind wanders into high orbit. At this point in puzzle solving my mind goes into "magical mode". I look at illegal moves, in order to unearth patterns I have missed. I try teleporting Qa8+ Kc7 Nd5+ ??? Still nothing or Qf4 or even Qxf3? Threatens nothing and fails to defend around my K. 6: ONLY NOW do I see that Q (not R) xf7 threatens #1! Qb6 fails to Nh4 And I say to myself 'I have solved it' and make the first move. Green!"
But black comes up with the fiendish defence of Nd2+ Kc1 Ba3+!!. I had truly missed this. I see now that I must be carful to respond correctly. And here is the interesting bit: If I had seen this line before making the first move, I had been stuck for yet a while. I am guessing that if I had seen this line beforehand, I would have played KxN in my mind. But now that I had it in front of me, after a minute in dawned on me that I must not capture since that 1: allows spit checks 2: self pins my Nc3, which was instrumental in the line above! So in the end only Kc1 remains.
So, I do not have a clear full-board "V". So I must resort to analytical thinking "A" blended with "M" . In conclusion I guess my model is best described as: "A" * "M" * "V" with many flaws!