...
...
...
Hi Jerry, it's lichess
this is to ease
lol
I feel bad for Alex Lenderman having to face the buzzsaw constantly!
it was an interesting game however starting down a piece is a joke yes you could say starting down a piece to make it more even but if you are removing pieces it is not really a proper game is it? it is like a Gm playing a lower rated player with no queen then he loses he can always argue yea I lost cause of the material disadvantage or like play 3 to 1 time controls then say I lost cause of the time control.
It is interesting to see how Leela compensates for its initial material disadvantage by agressiveness, focusing on the development and activity of the pieces.
However, I would not see this victory should as AI genius, at least not in this specific game. The game was won thanks to two blunders by the GM, which were probably avoidable as the subsequent sequence was forced and calculable (was he short on time?). Lenderman was in a very good position, and my guess is that in a longer game, he likely wouldn’t have played the losing sequence...
Someone tell me how to train Lila on the parts of Paul Morphy, so that she only knows them, please give a link, I would like to see how she will play in his style!!!
who needs this anyway???